Compare and contrast the 2 trials of Tom Brown in To Eliminate a Mockingbird and 14 Angry Guys. * Similarities:
2. In To Get rid of a Mockingbird, Atticus guards Tom Johnson even though there was little chance he could win the trial. This individual did most he could to help Tom, and put fully effort in to the trial. In Twelve Furious Men, juror number eight defends the boy, despite the fact that everyone else thinks he's accountable. They both equally did not surrender and in this till the final. * They are dealing with misjudgment in the two. In To Eliminate a Mockingbird, the bias is seen mainly because Tom can be described as black person going against a white man's expression, and the jury is all white-colored and misjudgment. In 14 Angry Men, prejudice is observed because the young man in trial is through the slums; he could be criticized as a result of where he lives. * Juror # almost 8 and Atticus both work with evidence and facts to prove their very own point. Each uses logos. 2. In the book plus the play, a life is on the line. The accused would be put in the chair in the event that proven guilt ridden. * You never figure out the accused is truly blameless or guilty. You only find what the court decides. 5. The words of witnesses are doubtful.
* Atticus lost the trial, although juror # 8 persuaded the rest of the court to have your vote " not guiltyвЂќ. 2. Atticus is known as a lawyer, so he was defending Tom in court. Juror # almost 8 was portion of the jury and was protecting the boy against the rest of the jury, trying to get them to election " not really guiltyвЂќ * Tom is definitely accused of rape; the boy is definitely accused of murder. * In 14 Angry Men, there is more physical proof of the offense then into Kill a Mockingbird. In To Kill a Mockingbird there exists mostly just the word of witnesses intended for evidence.